Frederik Ramm <frederik@...> writes: >3. OSMF to choose a new license that is "free and open", present it to >OSM community for vote, and get 2/3 of active mappers to agree with the >new license. This is the only bit that is new, and the "2/3 of mappers" >hurdle can hardly be called "allow the board to tweak the license".
The process is pretty simple really: - decide what licence you want without bothering to hold a vote - get everyone to sign up to new contributor terms allowing that licence - block anyone who says no from contributing and presto! you have your 2/3 majority of active contributors. Of course the OSMF would never do anything like that... -- Ed Avis <e...@waniasset.com> _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
