On 25 December 2011 21:05, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 13:48:24 +0000 >> 4. Well-meaning new (therefore agreeing) mapper sees the node, notices >> the cuisine tag in the history and reapplies it without having >> personal knowledge to back this up. odbl=clean is still set. > > To me, this is on par with "well-meaning new mapper copies data from > Google believing it is ok". It is something where we have to make a > good effort to explain to people that they shouldn't do it, and if it > turns out somebody has misunderstood, or made a mistake, then we have > to fix that. > > I don't see *many* people using history to look for extra features to > re-animate. OK, that's fine by me - I like that answer, because it allows us to respect odbl=clean in all cases. I also agree that anybody rummaging in the history for lost tags can be expected to know better than to re-animate tainted tags. Dermot -- -------------------------------------- Igaühel on siin oma laul ja ma oma ei leiagi üles _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk