https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/index.html the license is quite clear and 4.2 applies to the case you mention. any use of OSM data (over 100 nodes) combined with proprietary data results in more open data under ODbL. we are here to create more open data, not to feed proprietary data than is lock under their TOS.
On Thu, 12 Dec 2019, 18:53 , <matthias.straetl...@buerotiger.de> wrote: > > From a practical point of view, boundaries in OSM rarely originate from > surveys, > > you might be lucky to be able to identify the original source (most > likely open data) > > which may have a more liberal license than ODbL (check the history and > changeset > > source tags / object source tags). > > But I neither want to merge OSM data or add it to my data. I just want to > use it to > select points of my dataset. > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
