Please stop constructing such cases. This case clearly would have the intention of reproducing the OSM database.
My intention is the trivial use of OpenStreetMap. A normal process in the GIS world.
Gesendet: Freitag, 13. Dezember 2019 um 10:44 Uhr
Von: "Mateusz Konieczny" <matkoni...@tutanota.com>
An: "Licensing and other legal discussions." <legal-talk@openstreetmap.org>
Betreff: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data
Von: "Mateusz Konieczny" <matkoni...@tutanota.com>
An: "Licensing and other legal discussions." <legal-talk@openstreetmap.org>
Betreff: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data
13 Dec 2019, 09:48 by frede...@remote.org:
I end up with a database of "streets that have at least one pub". Thisdatabase does not include OSM data.In my eyes, though, it is still *derived* from OSM data. It is theresult of an algorithmic process that has made use of OSM data; if youwill, the OSM data residue is in the name/description of my newdatabase: "roads with pubs". It is derived from OSM; it could not havebeen made without OSM.
Or more extreme.
(1) I create database of points on the grid of 0.1 cm.
(2) I create two list, first contains what according to OSM is on land,
second contains what according to OSM data is water
(3) I claim that both lists are not ODBL licenced.
Are you going to claim that also this one is legally sound, and not Mapbox-tier
"attribution hidden behind mystery meat "(i)" navigation
fulfills ODBL attribution requirement" swindle?
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk