Please stop constructing such cases. This case clearly would have the intention of reproducing the OSM database.
My intention is the trivial use of OpenStreetMap. A normal process in the GIS world.
 
Gesendet: Freitag, 13. Dezember 2019 um 10:44 Uhr
Von: "Mateusz Konieczny" <matkoni...@tutanota.com>
An: "Licensing and other legal discussions." <legal-talk@openstreetmap.org>
Betreff: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data
 
 
 
13 Dec 2019, 09:48 by frede...@remote.org:
I end up with a database of "streets that have at least one pub". This
database does not include OSM data.
 
In my eyes, though, it is still *derived* from OSM data. It is the
result of an algorithmic process that has made use of OSM data; if you
will, the OSM data residue is in the name/description of my new
database: "roads with pubs". It is derived from OSM; it could not have
been made without OSM.
Or more extreme.
 
(1) I create database of points on the grid of 0.1 cm.
(2) I create two list, first contains what according to OSM is on land,
second contains what according to OSM data is water
(3) I claim that both lists are not ODBL licenced.
 
Are you going to claim that also this one is legally sound, and not Mapbox-tier
"attribution hidden behind mystery meat "(i)" navigation
fulfills ODBL attribution requirement" swindle?
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Reply via email to