This seems similar to the problem discussed here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Metadata_Layers_-_Guideline
The doctrine proposed by Richard Fairhurst (and discussed on that page) strikes me as reasonable. It's hard for me to see how OSM IDs could qualify as a substantial part of the database when used in isolation, in this manner. They're algorithmically generated and, by themselves, contain no information about the world that OSM describes. In a broader sense, it seems like it would be very counterproductive for an open project to embrace policies that make it difficult for people to even *refer* to useful parts of it, which is what a hyperlink amounts to. On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:57 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > In Italy we have been discussing this situation: a member of the community > wants to add links to OSM objects into a list of specific shops (those that > are open during the covid-19 pandemia). > > The list will be published here: https://www.covid19italia.help/opendata/ > with an CC-BY-4.0 license. > > The links will be of the kind > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1834818 > > Question is, will it be possible to publish such a list, containing > OSM-ids (or links to OSM objects) with a CC-BY-4.0 license? > > Thank you for your replies. > > Cheers > Martin > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
