At least in English, "not reuse the Information in a way that suggests that it is official or that Licensor approves your use of the Information; take all reasonable steps to ensure that the uses permitted above do not mislead others and that the Information itself is not misrepresented." reads as a trademark clause, which has always been okay and compatible. -Kathleen
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 8:42 AM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 14. Jul 2020, at 15:28, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> > wrote: > > > > Maybe they assume that it is covered > > anyway by moral rights? > > > > But ODBL waives moral rights if allowed > > by law, > > it attempts to block asserting such claims, > > and so on. > > > > Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer etc > > > neither am I, just wondering up to which level contradictions and > uncertainties in licensing terms are still ok for OpenStreetMap and when > it’s too much. > > Cheers Martin > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk