Some here would say that when the publisher indicates their interpretation of the license then we can rely on that instead going with our interpretation of the license, but I am not a lawyer.
If they can sign the LWG waiver it makes things a lot easier, but it's not the only option. On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 19:45, Mateusz Konieczny via legal-talk < legal-talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > Is > > "it is good enough for us to be named as the data owner here: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Kartverket_.28Norwegian_Mapping_Authority.29 > " > > (see http://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/kart/2014-August/004831.html for the > original text) > sufficient to solve problems of CC BY 4.0? > > As I understand CC BY 4.0 requires waiver for DRM related reasons, and > that it would not > be sufficient. > > For context see > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Import/Catalogue/Road_import_(Norway) > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
