Just as a note, prior to the review of CC BY 4.0 compatibility by the LWG (and CC fwiw), we were very clear that 4.0 licensed material should -not- be imported, the importers knew this and were ignoring it at their own risk.

Simon

Am 23.10.2020 um 10:43 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via legal-talk:
Is

"it is good enough for us to be named as the data owner here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Kartverket_.28Norwegian_Mapping_Authority.29 <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Kartverket_.28Norwegian_Mapping_Authority.29> "

(see http://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/kart/2014-August/004831.html <http://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/kart/2014-August/004831.html> for the original text)
sufficient to solve problems of CC BY 4.0?

As I understand CC BY 4.0 requires waiver for DRM related reasons, and that it would not
be sufficient.

For context see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Import/Catalogue/Road_import_(Norway) <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Import/Catalogue/Road_import_(Norway)>

_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x4721711092E282EA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Reply via email to