On 07/03/2018 10:53 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 07/03/2018 04:06 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > >> On 07/03/2018 08:35 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> Does this license still qualify as a BSD variant? > >>> The Inner Net License drops condition 4. >> >> Well, despite being based on BSD, the addition of clause 0 makes this a >> new license. If Clause 0 is invoked, the result is non-free. > > Right. But it is not dissimilar to the sell-yourself-into-slavery > clause in the GPLv3, so it should be okay. > >> Is this license on anything in Fedora? > > radvd uses it, and probably a few other things in the IPv6 context. (It > may be KAME-related.) getaddrinfo in glibc is partly covered by it, too > (without the advertising clause).
Okay. radvd license is added as "radvd". Inner Net License (radvd with advertising clause waived) is added as "Inner-Net". Thanks, ~tom _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/PJR5WECS5CCXZCXITIBGS7KOA6DJQYIQ/
