Thorsten,
Thanks for reply.
All your postings are done through attachments. Weren't you aware? Check the
sources.
BTW, binaries could never be the same even when produced on one machine and
with exactly the same sources and conditions.
Did you know it? It's simple. File contains datetime stamp in PE header and
at least this will differ. Needless to say that they will be different if
different service packs are applied to the compiler.
Okay, I realize that I need somebody from Mozilla to answer my question and
shed some light on this.
TIA.
-jv
Hi,
* Vlad J. wrote (2006-12-03 23:28):
>Thanks for forwaring me that attachment (...)
What attachment? If there was a file on my mail, it wasn't mine.
>I'm not quite sure I got the idea where trademarks might be abused in
>explained scenario.
Neither do I. I just pointed out the the trademark follows differnt
rules than the code. That even lead one Linux distribution to declare
Firefox unfree and roll their own version with its own name and logo.
>Am I allowed to distribute FireFox that I downloaded from non-mozilla web
>site?
>Suppose, it is _exactly_ binary copy of what is provided from mozilla?
I guess, but you possibly won't get an identical copy with a different
compiler switch.
Thorsten
--
Getting a thrill out of some stupid quote is a sign of idiocy.
- turmeric
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/legal
