Hi Benjamin,

Thanks for your reply.

Are you sure it does not use "FireFox"? :) :)
Did you check the site? You'll find a lot of "FireFox" words related to this
ActiveX Control, not to FireFox borwser. Also it uses "Mozilla" :)

Thanks for pointing out that I could use this Control.
No, I can not use it because it is broken at its present version (I mean
sources), it's abandoned and not updated for many versions and finally it is
intended for Windows only, while I need a cross-platform solution (read
XPCom-based).
XULRunner as far as I understand is supposed to run application(s), while I
need Gecko API exposed. There are no plans on creating plugins or extensions
or XUL applications. We'd need Gecko available through an API, just similar
to referenced ActiveX Control.

> If you just use the code without the
> Mozilla-owned trademarks (Firefox, Thunderbird, Mozilla *), you can do
> pretty much anything you want.

Well, it's pretty clear  that I can not create my own distro and call it
FireFox or Mozilla and it's not what I'm discussing there. That control is
not called Mozilla or FireFox, btw.
It's called Mozilla Control. What if I call my distro Embedded Mozilla
Browser? I think with this approach there would be no collisions or
misinterprettings or abuses.

-jv






"Benjamin Smedberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Vlad J. wrote:
> > Axel,
> >
> > Thanks for the explanation, but I'd love to get an idea if this
> > http://www.iol.ie/%7Elocka/mozilla/mozilla.htm  falls into legal
conditions
> > or not.
> > Indeed, no one can ever create ActiveX from Mozilla sources with all the
> > default compiler switches, hence they are merely changed. All the
sources
> > remain the same.
> > Adam Lock compiled all the stuff, wrapped up into installer (he created
his
> > own installation script) and looks like everything is legal.
> > Any comments?
>
> That code does not use the Firefox trademark, and therefore this whole
> discussion about trademark licensing is moot. I'm pretty sure that you can
> compile the ActiveX control against XULRunner and use it just fine,
without
> any mention of Firefox at all.
>
> The important point here is that if you use "firefox" branding anywhere,
you
> need to get a trademark license. If you just use the code without the
> Mozilla-owned trademarks (Firefox, Thunderbird, Mozilla *), you can do
> pretty much anything you want.
>
> --BDS
>


_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/legal

Reply via email to