On 13/02/13 21:10, Wraithan (Chris McDonald) wrote: > Can't say I am keen on this. we are taking away the ability for us to > license things to fit into the community they are being built for? BSD > being the way of the vast majority of python/django projects.
It would be great if you could help us understand why Apache (which is, in legal effect, BSD with a patent clause) is unacceptable to that community. > It appears none of the discussion made any difference because you've > gone right back to what you were originally arguing for. My understanding was that the web dev team were keen on non-copyleft licensing, which the licensing policy didn't allow; formally enabling that was what this discussion was all about. If that's not the point you were making, then there's been some miscommunication. > I've CC'd webdev as there are a lot of us who feel strongly on this and > the email didn't go out to all of them. I did my best to get people involved in the discussion, including a specific email written to the webdev list to come and get involved. If webdevs aren't reading the webdev list, then could I politely suggest their community engagement needs a little polishing? Gerv _______________________________________________ legal mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/legal
