Hallöchen! Carl von Einem writes:
> [...] > > I volunteer to ask on hugin-ptx about the status of lensfun in > hugin just to make sure. Carl, I am irritated by the thread there. 1. I've never been "fuzzy" with my statements here. This is simply not true. 2. Thomas Modes is complaining about only exactly *one* thing: Hugin used to pass "0" as an argument when this was undefined by the API documentation. Then, we changed the behaviour of "0" and documented it, and his code broke. This is the problem of the calling program in my world. (The discussion is archived somewhere.) I personally -- not as a representative of Lensfun -- am happy about the departure of Hugin. Thomas contributed code to Lensfun that could only be used by Hugin. After the departure, we could get rid of it. At the same time, we got rid of an erroneous calculation of the focal length, which still is in Hugin: I filed a bug report, and https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/1307457 certainly demonstrates well why don't like to follow-up on the Hugin mailing list. Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger Jabber ID: torsten.bron...@jabber.rwth-aachen.de or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Lensfun-users mailing list Lensfun-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lensfun-users
