On Thu, Dec 7, 2017, at 07:18, Аl Воgnеr wrote: > Am Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:32:01 +0100 > schrieb Аl Воgnеr <darktable...@corr.eu.org>: > > > Am Wed, 06 Dec 2017 23:26:08 -0800 > > schrieb junkyardspar...@yepmail.net: > > > > > I adjuststed the model name in the database to match your reported > > > Exif model name. > > I found another Tamron-lens which doesn't work with the Pentax K-5. > > Exif-Data in photo: > Tamron SP AF 10-24mm F3.5-4.5 Di II LD Aspherical [IF] > > in DB: > Tamron SP AF 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II LD Aspherical (IF) > > The difference is the slash, which should be ignored in theory. > > I have to choose the lens manually to see a correction. > > There is 1 Tamron-lens here, which works fine: > > Tamron AF 17-50mm F2.8 XR Di-II LD (Model A16) > > > <lens> > <!-- This is an alias of Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD > Aspherical (IF). According to da...@corr.eu.org, they are > optically equivalent. --> > <maker>Tamron</maker> > <model>Tamron AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II LD (Model A16)</model> > > > So maybe the file has to be changed like for the 17-50?
Yes, it looks like some of the lenses in the database need the extra model number added to the names. For instance, I found DNG files in the calibration upload repository for the 70-200mm, and the name reported in darktable was: Tamron SP AF 70-200mm F2.8 Di LD [IF] Macro (A001) where the entry in the database was lacking the last '(A001)' part (has been added now). If you can compile a list of other such cases, they can be updated in the repository. It can be difficult to see long names in the information panel in darktable, but you can right-click, select-all, and copy... then paste that name into your new file for testing. I can't easily troubleshoot your issue with files in ~/.local/share/lensfun not being given priority; I'm using darktable built against a different version of lensfun. Two things to keep in mind with the database files for your version, though: you will need to *not* have the 'version="n"' part in the line: <lensdatabase version="n"> and *not* have the <aspect-ratio> tag in the profile (more likely found in newer non-SLR profiles). AFAIK those are the important differences between current git files and 0.2.8 compatibility. Hope that helps. -- jys ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Lensfun-users mailing list Lensfun-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lensfun-users
