I have only organizing and thin nodes in my outline tree. Only the children of thin nodes suffer from cleo amnesia! It seems that the problem is related to thin nodes (at least in my case!)
Regards Nik On Apr 3, 9:51 am, Nik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yesterday I have played around with different cleo setting of my > outline tree > which led to the observation mentioned im my first posting! > I have now reorganized my outline tree and still have a similar > problem. > My outline tree has now the following structure: > > @chapters > @chapter AAA > BBB > CCC > DDD > aaa > bbb > ccc > .... > > All nodes under DDD lose their cleo settings after a LEO restart. > I have also tried the following tree: > > @chapters > @chapter AAA > BBB > CCC > aaa > bbb > ccc > .... > > The same problem with the children of CCC! > It seems that it does not depend on the depth of nodes. > > Regards > Nik > > On Apr 2, 8:17 pm, Terry Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 01:47:44 -0700 (PDT) > > > Nik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have the following strange problem with cleo plugin. > > > My cleo settings on nodes at depth > 7 are not permenant. > > > Each time after restarting LEO cleo loses my settings on these nodes!! > > > > I'm using LEO 4.4.8 beta 3. > > > Hmmm, can't duplicate that on the trunk. I assume you're not using > > thyrus's speedups? Not that I'm in anyway suggesting they're to blame, > > just that they do have something to do with recursion, but I can't see > > why depth of a simple outline should matter. > > > Ha - I bet I know what the problem is. I need to update the cleo docs. > > to explain this. Mainly for historical reasons, cleo stores its > > attributes on vnodes. So for this tree: > > > A > > B > > C > > D > > B > > C > > D > > > (who remembers the dark ages when we couldn't use indentation :-) > > > Assuming that the Bs are clones of each other, C and D are in fact the > > same vnodes (i.e. both Cs are the same vnode, and both Ds are the same > > vnode). So they will always have the same cleo attributes. > > > Hmm, I guess this isn't seeming so much like an explanation as I > > thought. > > > Do you have a simple test case? > > > Cheers -Terry --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
