On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Terry Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 03:05:27 -0700 (PDT) > Nik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have only organizing and thin nodes in my outline tree. > > Only the children of thin nodes suffer from cleo amnesia! > > It seems that the problem is related to thin nodes (at least in my > > case!) > > Ah, @thin nodes, I should have thought of that. Leo doesn't save > attributes on vnodes which descend from @thin nodes. > > I'm sure there's a reason for that although I don't know what it is, > Edward? The reason is simple: vnodes do not exist in @thin trees. gnx's in files derived from @thin refer to tnodes, not vnode. Thus, Leo creates "anonymous" vnodes when reading thin derived files. This can never change, the @thin read code is robust precisely because it does *not* save vnode info. > Cleo could switch to storing its attributes on tnodes, but it's not > clear that that's always desirable, sometimes it's nice to have cleo > "markup" on a node in one context and not in another - talking about > clones here of course. > > I'll wait to see what Edward says about vnodes which descend from @thin > nodes before thinking more about possible solutions. It's not an easy problem. You would like the flexibility of per-vnode attributes, but that won't work for @thin files. But whatever you do, please wait until after 4.4.8 final to do it :-) Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
