On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:43:42 +0300 "Ville M. Vainio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You should never push no another branch - you should always do merge > instead. Push is essentially a copy operation that makes the target > branch the same as the source branch. I learned that lesson. But, and this is a discussion that was beaten to death a few weeks ago, you can't actually merge to a remote branch, correct? You instead have to merge to a local copy (branch) of that branch (first sync'ed by pulling), and then push from the local copy to the remote - right? Or use a checkout of the remote branch, rather than a branch. Perhaps that's the workflow that makes more sense? Cheers -Terry --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
