On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Terry Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I learned that lesson. But, and this is a discussion that was beaten > to death a few weeks ago, you can't actually merge to a remote branch, > correct? You instead have to merge to a local copy (branch) of that > branch (first sync'ed by pulling), and then push from the local copy to > the remote - right? Or use a checkout of the remote branch, rather Right. > than a branch. Perhaps that's the workflow that makes more sense? That's the workflow that was recommended on bzr mailing list, at least. I kind of prefer separate checkin and push, because push is kind of slow operation and I like my stuff safely checked in before pushing. But that's just a personal preference :-) -- Ville M. Vainio - vivainio.googlepages.com blog=360.yahoo.com/villevainio - g[mail | talk]='vivainio' --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
