On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Terry Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:48:15 -0700 (PDT) > TL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The Sax-Graph branch does not automatically fix the problem with Cleo > > attributes associated with sub-nodes of @thin nodes being lost when > > Leo is closed and reopened. > > Was it supposed to? Cleo currently stores attributes on vnodes, vnode uAs > aren't written in @thin nodes. > > > Will the low-level node changes provide > > that support? If so, what needs to be done to Cleo? > > We really need Edward to chime in here, because I haven't been paying > enough attention to the details of the Sax-Graph stuff, but my impression is > that nothing fundamental has changed yet, the sax read is just doing what > the old read code did, and there are still v and t nodes. The position > interface is different perhaps, in terms of p.stack, p.parents? > Apparently our emails crossed on the net. Your statements are exactly as I understand the situation, and exactly as I intend the situation to be. The stack is "fully populated" in the sax-graph world, which means that the entire set of parents at a position is always easily accessible. However, this is really an internal implementation detail. Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
