On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:11:30 -0500 "Edward K. Ream" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently our emails crossed on the net. Your statements are > exactly as I understand the situation, and exactly as I intend the > situation to be. Criss-cross emails, like criss-cross merges, only less troublesome :) > The stack is "fully populated" in the sax-graph world, which means > that the entire set of parents at a position is always easily > accessible. However, this is really an internal implementation > detail. Given that you can arrive at the same node by different paths, I think a fully populated stack gives plugins a valuable tool for determining context, so I don't think it's just an internal implementation detail. Maybe the old p.stack did that too, but it's much less confusing in its new form. Cheers -Terry --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
