On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:48 AM, vitalije <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why Leo don't use for all kinds of files same sentinels in private > files ? Possible, I suppose, but I don't want to destroy the validity of private files absent an overwhelmingly good reason. Private files ought to be valid backup files. Perhaps more to the point, I don't want to change the internals of the present fundamental merge algorithm. The present code works as is. > I am not sure, but I think that private files need not be syntax > valid. If Leo used same sentinels for all types of private files, then > changing of @language directive without changing file extension would > not confuse Leo's @shadow code. I suspect the problem is that Leo gets confused by the changed name of the file: the contents of the files probably don't matter. Anyway, I expect to fix this before Leo b4. Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
