Spurious sentinels get escaped with a preceding sentinel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How much damage would I cause if I changed the meaning from "ignore
apparent following sentinel" to "append the following line verbatim to
the node body text"? Perhaps I could even introduce a directive
@verbatim that would cause leo to ignore both apparent directives and
section references in the immediately following line, implemented in
the .leo file by the [EMAIL PROTECTED] sentinel. I've no idea how difficult
this will be.
- Stephen
On Oct 25, 2:54 am, thyrsus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks who don't use leo don't feel the need to avoid having << and >>
> on the same line.
>
> Could there be an escape mechanism to represent those in
> the .leo_shadow file?
>
> Do the .leo_shadow files escape "@string" that might occur in the
> originals?
>
> - Stephen
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
