On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:54 AM, thyrsus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Folks who don't use leo don't feel the need to avoid having << and >> > on the same line. > > Could there be an escape mechanism to represent those in > the .leo_shadow file?
The only "escape" mechanism is that g.angleBrackets(s) will return s surrounded by '<<' and '>>'. I assume you mean that Leo's read and write code would provide a way of saying, "ignore what looks like a section reference in this line (or piece of code)". Sorry, but that can never happen. More than 10 years ago now, when I first discovered noweb and decided to base Leo's LP syntax on noweb, I made an explicit decision not to support any of noweb's escape conventions. This was based on my experience of trying to support escape conventions in @root trees. It's a nightmare. I have never once regretted this decision. Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
