I agree Jon. The expectation is that the expanding/contracting node headline should remain in the same position, and all nodes below this node should change.
That being said, this is better than when the node shifted to the bottom, and would be OK, but not the expected behavior, IMO. Mike jkn wrote: > I haven't really got enough experience of the old vs. the new to > say ... but I will make a few comments anyway ;-o. This is on rev > 1502. > > I actively dislike what I see when I expand/contract a node, which is > that the vertical position of the selected parent node shifts within > the outline pane. IMO it is the (vertical) position of the 'parent > node' which should be stationary in this case. > > This observed behaviour may depend on the number of child nodes, & > whether they go off the bottom of the outline pane. > > I've just had a look at the tk behaviour and it doesn't seem very much > different, so maybe the behaviour I dislike has always been there ... > > Nevertheless, HTH > > Jon N > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
