On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >> This doesn't seem any harder than using special annotation like \=4
> >> (or whatever it was). Just interpret 2 spaces as \=2 (though I'm not
> >> sure what you meant by \=N exactly.
> >
> > Yes, I think you are right about the complexity.  It's not *that* hard to
> > do.  But it does imply non-trivial changes to the sax-read code, and I
> would
> > rather not go there.
>
> Doesn't it rather affect @auto read/write code?


Yes, I think so.  This just shows how easy it is to get confused.

>
>
> However, it's always good to make leo as diff-hygienic as possible -
> reduces the initial "I can't use leo to make a small change to one
> function" reaction.


No doubt about it.

Edward

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to