On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
> The apparent conclusion is that making any shared workflow @shadow- > friendly is going to difficult in some way. Either we solve a complex > diff problem, or we restrict Alice's and Bob's workflow so that no > structural changes occur. This does not seem like a sweet spot of > design :-) Structural changes would not need to be strictly prevented, just limited. One solution *might* be using << section >> references instead of @others in root nodes. This would allow restructuring while retaining the function order in original files. Admittedly it does seem a bit fragile. -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
