On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Largo84 <[email protected]> wrote: > > I really like this idea a lot! I use Leo mostly for document creation > and editing in either straight LaTex or rst (for when I also need htm > or odt output). It would be great to work with the rst file via import > and write back without adding any overhead. Sorry I'm not much help in > getting it there! Maybe in my next life I can learn Python. > > What I would also like to see is an option to create odt files using > the rst3 plugin (either using the existing plugin or a new one). How > difficult would that be?
Not too difficult evidently, see below $ ls /usr/bin/rst2* /usr/bin/rst2html.py /usr/bin/rst2odt_prepstyles.py /usr/bin/rst2s5.py /usr/bin/rst2latex.py /usr/bin/rst2odt.py /usr/bin/rst2xml.py /usr/bin/rst2newlatex.py /usr/bin/rst2pseudoxml.py The missing capability, which we are working on is rst2rst.py > > Rob............. > > On Apr 3, 1:49 pm, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Kent and I spent quite awhile at the sprint discussing Leo as a >> platform for rST markup. Kent's idea was that Leo should be able to >> import rst files, have the user edit the files, and then write the >> files with no changes whatever except the changes the user actually >> made. I agree completely that this is a good goal. >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
