On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 6:26 PM, TL <[email protected]> wrote: > >> However, I think there is another way, namely to create a Leo importer >> for rst files. Parsing rst files is actually not too difficult. The >> problem lies in retaining the exact markup used to represent rST >> section. That is, we want to remember, say, that the original file >> used ###### as the underlining for top-level markup. > > Why is it important to use the same markup as the original file? Rst > is designed to allow any markups to be used without affecting the > output.
For the situation where the rst files are versioned, and you don't want to create a diff for every section headline. You might also want to apply a specific 'style' to a rst document. > > TL > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
