On Apr 7, 2:07 pm, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > That is, it would seem to be possible to avoid the horrible, keyboard-
> > dependent "shift", "keyboardUpper1" and "keyboardUpperLong".
Drat. There is a big glitch. On my keyboard, Qt reports Shift-0 as
'(', but reports Ctrl-Shift-0 as Ctrl-Shift-0 (!!)
My plan is to keep the new, simpler code, but to build in some more
capabilities. These are not strictly necessary. One could require
the user to bind commands to Ctrl-Shift-0 instead of Ctrl-( or Ctrl-
parenleft, but that's ugly and might lead to different bindings for Qt
and Tk.
So some new invention is needed--perhaps an *optional* description of
keyboard layout. I'll sleep on this...
Edward
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
