Hi, I'm checking the fix in rev 1750. It doesn't work for me. I use the following rst-options:
@nocolor @ @rst-options default_path=./latex code_mode=False generate_rst=True http_server_support = False show_organizer_nodes=True show_headlines=True show_leo_directives=True write_intermediate_file = False verbose=True publish_argv_for_missing_stylesheets=--language=ca, --use-latex-toc, -- output-encoding=utf-8, --stylesheet=/home/vmas/.leo/custom_style.sty @c and have a rst-node like: @rst Chapter_19_Electric_field.tex Now, when I select this node (or some child) and execute the Write- Restructured-Text command I can see the following output in the log pane (written in red) and in the konsole: stylesheet not found open directory: /home/vmas/oposicions/carpeta_prova relative path: absolute path: /home/vmas/oposicions/carpeta_prova/default.css wrote: /home/vmas/oposicions/carpeta_prova/latex/ Chapter_19_Electric_field.tex done Although the tex file is generated, reading it shows that the options passed via publish_argv_for_missing_stylesheets are being ignored. I don't remember to have problems finding the stylesheet before. Maybe something has changed on this subject and I'm missing it? Just one more question. When reading http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/rstplugin3.html one can see that all rst options use underscores for joining words... all but publish-argv-for-missing-stylesheets which uses dashes. Is it a mistake in the page? Anyway, I've got the results described above with both syntaxes. Vicent On 28 Abr, 20:51, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:54 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> the arguments passed to option > >> publish_argv_for_missing_stylesheets are passed to the overrides > >> dictionary as a list: > > >> [u'--language=ca', u'--use-latex-toc', u'--output-encoding=utf-8', u'-- > >> stylesheet=/home/vmas/.leo/custom_style.sty'] > > >> which is neither a dictionary nor an iterable of key/value pairs > > > Many thanks for this report. I'll fix it immediately. > > Rev 1748 of the trunk contains an attempted fix. I am using the new code > without problems, and a simple hand test passes, but the testing is still > minimal. Please report any problems immediately. Thanks. > > Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
