On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Steve Zatz<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Having the .leo file in version control hurts no one ... > > > But what is the reason to have it in version control? In my mind, > > It's a backup thing. If it contains valuable data, it won't be > permanently scorched by rm -Rf . or equivalent. You can call it > foo_steve.leo or whatever if you wish ;-). > Yes, and and that is the case for my project. Also, I'll probably go to @thin files and make Leo a prerequisite for developing on the project. (It is under GPLv2+an exemption to allow dynamic linking with GPL-incompatible code.) --Lucas --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
