On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Lucas Thode<[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes, and and that is the case for my project. Also, I'll probably go to > > @thin files and make Leo a prerequisite for developing on the project. > (It > > is under GPLv2+an exemption to allow dynamic linking with > GPL-incompatible > > code.) > > Off topic - why not LGPL then? GPL + exemption sounds rather complicated). > > Trying to keep this brief: it's a plugin loaded that eventually gets loaded into a closed-source application as opposed to a general purpose library. --Lucas --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
