On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
> I hope you will understand my reasoning, but if not, it's just too bad :-) > Imo, the damage to the 46-branch is irremediable, and even if it could be > fixed, I am not going to do it. I understand the reasoning perfectly. Calling it 4.7b is the important part, we don't want to send a wrong signal with version numbering. 4.6.3 should be "obviously better" choice than 4.6.2 in all respects. Do your work with 4.7, and I'll schedule some quality time later on to do the work for 4.6.4. I was never insisting that you do the work, just that it's a good idea to do it :-). -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
