On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I hope you will understand my reasoning, but if not, it's just too bad > :-) > > Imo, the damage to the 46-branch is irremediable, and even if it could be > > fixed, I am not going to do it. > > I understand the reasoning perfectly. Calling it 4.7b is the important > part, we don't want to send a wrong signal with version numbering. > 4.6.3 should be "obviously better" choice than 4.6.2 in all respects. > Excellent. We are in full agreement. > > Do your work with 4.7, and I'll schedule some quality time later on to > do the work for 4.6.4. I was never insisting that you do the work, > just that it's a good idea to do it :-). > Thanks very much. Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
