On Jan 22, 8:24 am, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I may have found the source of the problem. The code in atFile.read() > that determines whether an @file node is an old or new format by > looking for a tnodeList attribute of the root node. But this > attribute comes from the .leo file, not the external file! This is a > dubious, fragile scheme. It would seem safer to look at the @+leo > line of the external file. Continuing this line of thought, I'm going to abandon the to-do list item, "Delete resurrected nodes". This would be a dangerous thing to do. Resurrected nodes are a serious problem, and rare. If they do happen, we want to keep things *as they are* so the problem can be studied. The last thing we want is to mess things up further with little used, highly complex error recovery code. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
