Woops, I didn't read past the first couple messages before posting . . .

Seth

On 3/21/10, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 20, 3:30 pm, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The 26 February issue of Science contains an article called
>> “Scientists Grapple With 'Completely Out of Hand' Attacks on Climate
>> Science.” To date, the scientific community seems completely clueless
>> about how to deal with this situation.  Clearly, the outrageous
>> attacks of the climate deniers will continue as long as the the
>> response by the scientific community remains feeble and misguided.
>
> I am going to close this thread now.
>
> Any responses will be deleted and the author or authors may be banned.
>
> I am enraged by the inability of people to respond to the substance of
> what I have said.
>
> Instead, we see the typical denier tactics: personal abuse and an
> absolute refusal to deal with the real issues.
>
> I insist on a higher level of discourse throughout the leo-editor web
> site, regardless of topic.  Violate this and you are history.
>
> Edward
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "leo-editor" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.

Reply via email to