On May 8, 12:57 pm, "Ville M. Vainio" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Plugins to existing frameworks die much faster than individual > programs. All it takes is a major api rehaul and you are out, unless > you can muster the time and energy to port your stuff over. > > As an independent application Leo is much more resilient as the > maintenance is about features and bugfixing, which can be done "as > needed". Since I read your remark I've been envying Stephen Wolfram. My thought was that Mathematica and his company would continue long after him. But as recent events show, there are no guarantees. Furthermore, Mathematica is closed software; it's influence will be limited to the product itself, not its code. In other words, its time to put my envy aside and focus on making my successor successful :-) Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
