On May 16, 6:44 pm, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The :/; conventions would still be used. Actually, why bother? We might as well just consider that the newline before the next sentinel is "real". The point is that a newline will be added as needed to make the next sentinel start a line, so the only difference would be whether a newline appears in the outline. But that doesn't matter because the "output" is the same external file either way! In other words, @nonl and @nl just fussily mess up thin external files. Converting @nonl and @nl to ; and : doesn't really change anything. Getting rid of this conventions would be good: it would remove yet another source of meaningless bzr diffs. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
