On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
> All comments are welcome, but there is any way anyone is going to > change my mind about this. Leo deserves to lose about half its > apparent weight. +1. Actually removing support from the code (which is somewhat more controversial than doc changes) can also lead to secondary improvements when we uncover other things (functions, branches) that serve no purpose anymore. -- Ville M. Vainio @@ Forum Nokia -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
