On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:16:25 -0500 Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> I still don't see why they can't persist for all of file, auto, shadow, thin, > and edit. Is it because the uA are written to the <t/> element, and those > types don't have <t/> elements? That would explain it. They could have <t/> > elements simply to carry uAs of course... but I don't suppose that will > happen any time soon :-} Again, only the @<file> node itself, not > descendants, which obviously don't have <t/> elements. Mwahahahaahhaha - the load code already supports <t/> elements just to carry uAs on all of file, auto, shadow, thin, and edit. I just edited the .leo file and duplicated the one <t/> element (from the @file node) for the thin/edit/shadow and auto nodes, changing the @tx to match their @ts. And it worked. So if only a uA carrying <t/> could be written for those types... Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
