On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:16:25 -0500 > Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I still don't see why they can't persist for all of file, auto, shadow, >> thin, and edit. Is it because the uA are written to the <t/> element, and >> those types don't have <t/> elements? That would explain it. They could >> have <t/> elements simply to carry uAs of course... but I don't suppose that >> will happen any time soon :-} Again, only the @<file> node itself, not >> descendants, which obviously don't have <t/> elements. > > Mwahahahaahhaha - the load code already supports <t/> elements just to carry > uAs on all of file, auto, shadow, thin, and edit. I just edited the .leo > file and duplicated the one <t/> element (from the @file node) for the > thin/edit/shadow and auto nodes, changing the @tx to match their @ts. And it > worked. So if only a uA carrying <t/> could be written for those types...
Thanks for this detective work. These are good hints. I don't understand the implications just yet. Let me see why test.leo works the way it does. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
