On Sep 6, 12:54 pm, Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 10:15:25 -0700 (PDT) > "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I contend that the new code is actually at least as easy to understand > > than the xpath code. I think it would have been just as easy to write > > the new code as it would have been to write the old code. > > > In other words, for *this* application at least, lxml appears to add > > exactly nothing of significance to ElementTree. > > Of course I disagree.
We can disagree about xpath. Happily, distribution problems with lxml will not trouble us now. The present code at rev 19 is completely independent of lxml and will work on Py3k. Alas, PIL has not yet been ported to Py3k, so we are still better off using Py2k for this project. Rev 19 will likely be close to the final code, although I'll tweak it to make using it as easy as possible. In any event, inkcall is a *great* tool. Many thanks for your vision in creating it. Now it's time for me to start using it :-) Edward P.S. The error message about output.png was due to faulty command-line arguments. Missing files won't show a crash either. EKR -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
