On Jul 7, 10:27 am, "Edward K. Ream" <edream...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The "acid test" is whether Leo can be used by some, but not all, > developers on a significant project. At present, the best that can be > done in such situations is to use @auto or (maybe) @shadow for the > group's files. This is far from optimal because clones don't > "survive" in @auto. One can imagine situations in which the developers that don't use Leo are not hostile to having Leo's sentinels in the group's files. In this case, @file can be used and there are no problems. This case won't always happen, but it might be more common now that Leo's sentinels are so similar to Emacs org mode. However, in contrast to org-mode lines, Leo's sentinels contain the somewhat unsightly gnx's. In any event, not all projects would necessarily tolerate even "plain" org-mode lines, so the larger issues must, imo, still be confronted. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
