On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:09 AM, zpcspm <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 3, 12:06 am, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote: >> 4. html often will contain javascript code that has its own syntax >> rules. I'm not sure this makes any difference, actually. > > I am not sure either, isn't javascript supposed to be always wrapped > in a <script> tag? So the goal would be to have those <script> tags as > leo nodes, not to treat the javascript code inside them differently > than any other text inside other html tags.
Right. The question is, are html tags valid in javascript comments :-) It's a question only a compiler writer would ask... Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
