On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Seth Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Seth Johnson <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Kent Tenney <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> It sounds like the moral equivalent of a linked list.
>>>
>>> The "address" approach I've been leaning towards feels more
>>> robust / useful, but I haven't implemented with it, so I really
>>> don't know. It seems like what you describe is closer to the
>>> "node and edge" world view that graph software uses.
>>>
>>> In the web framework world there is a similiar dichotomy,
>>> mapping urls to content vs. traversing url paths.
>
>
> Reading more carefully, I should say that if I understand the
> distinction I think you're drawing, I think I'm doing both at the same
> time: every "node" has the full address for its context with it.

I'm reading your description as having 2 components,
- a graph of pointers to nodes
- the nodes referenced by the pointers

the graph defines addresses, the nodes are the data

Is this correct?

  But
> the outline structure is like a linked list, sort of.
>
>
> Seth
>
>
>> A linked list where every "node" has the context fully specified.  And
>> the fact there's only one "tree structure value" per record (the
>> parent key) keeps things simple, with everything in a simple, flat
>> denormalized data structure that's as fast to work with as
>> conceivable, as well as massively scalable -- perfectly amenable for
>> NoSQL backends, for instance.
>>
>> That flat structure lets you extend the basic concept of db relations
>> to what I call a context (so it has all the functions you need
>> regardless of specific context, rather than being simply joins of two
>> tables representing particular entities in the real world).
>>
>>
>> Seth
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "leo-editor" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.

Reply via email to