On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:
> So your nodes table is essentially my EDGES table :)

Ah!  Will check that, but I think you're probably right.  And your
nodes table would be more appropriately identified with my attributes
table(s).

The "bottom level" for me is the individual attribute values.  You
might call my entire structure "edges gone wild."  I don't have
encapsulation at the node level.

Maybe this will let me match it up with Leo format.  Would be good to
see some sort of "certified" db representation of Leo, with code that
gets it in and out.


Seth

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.

Reply via email to