On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 11:28:59 -0500 Seth Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> My impression is the only thing that keeps people from > going ahead with what you propose, or demo'ing any approach at all, is > uncertainty about having an adequate model that works with Leo's > intricacies. I think that's the case. @<file> handling is complex, I'm not sure how familiar with it Ville is, I've poked around the edges a bit, but don't know how it would interact with loading to / from a DB. And even if that wasn't an issue, the next step beyond using a DB to replace the file system would also be complex, whether it was sharing or whatever. Well, perhaps versioning wouldn't be so hard, but sharing is certainly challenging. Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
