On Jan 24, 6:02 am, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'll be wrestling with code today. Perhaps some new insights will arise as I > work... I suspect some of the problems arise because Leo's settings code uses "plain" dicts in many places. It seems to me that the only way to inject a better design into the code would be to use "manager" classes to ensure some desired properties of the various settings dicts. These classes would *have* dict ivars, they would not *be* (subclasses) of dicts. Having said this, I don't plan to add such dictionary-wrapping classes just now. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
