On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:27 AM, HansBKK <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This got me quite excited
>
> Imo, if people aren't excited by this Aha, then they don't get it ;-)

I don't get it. :-]

I have trouble following the explanation: my fault.

I did wonder if there is overlap with past discussions of generalising
Leo structure via 'nodes' and 'edges' where an edge is a first class
participant, instead of a pointer. That is the model in the graph db world.

I have a mental picture of that, but not yet of the current aha.

Thanks,
Kent

>
>> Let's say I've got the complete works of Carl Jung in plain text format, and
>> I want to create a self-contained hypertext "study guide" with several "axes
>> of access" for organizing in-depth textual analysis:
>
> [snip]
>
>> Think of what Leo now offers in the navigation outline as **the**
>> "canonical" ToC outline for the original work.
>
> [snip]
>
>> UI issues aside, my point is that each of these "alternative tables of
>> contents" can each stand on their own and present their own subset of the
>> content, re-sequenced and interleaved between different works from different 
>> authors.
>
> Exactly.  I've often said that there is no one "right" view of data,
> but unless we can define *fully co-equal* outline views, the
> "canonical" outline view is "more right" than any other outline view.
>
> At present in Leo, each node has only one "right" set of children!
> Your example shows why this is not optimal.
>
>> Bottom line is - empower the user to create multiple "parallel universes" of
>> meta-trees to navigate the same super-set of data.
>
> Yes. "Parallel universes" refer to different structure (sets of links)
> on the same "data", that is, the v.b, v.h and v.ua parts of vnodes.
>
> Edward
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "leo-editor" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.

Reply via email to