On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Seth Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > The table in which Ville stores edges can be extended with columns > representing the use type, "node" type and particular use (also > columns for state) within which nodes are being organized -- that is, > it can store edges with a specification of the context in which they > are being used (Ed's distinct "organizations"). > > Instead of a separate table for nodes, I store attributes as a general > entity type, and they too have context such that their values are > relevant to particular "organizations" of "nodes" or not. "Nodes" are > virtual in my scheme.
@Ville, @Seth: Thanks for reminding me of your (plural) earlier work. I am prone to forget such things. It's a fact of life at my age, alas. Or maybe it's not so much related to age as it is that I'm not really comfortable with db organizations, and so I have less to "hold on to", so to speak. I trust that when the time comes to do something about the Eureka you will keep reminding me of all the relevant issues. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
